Search This Blog

Tuesday 14 April 2015

Royal Dutch Shell & BG Group Kick off the Oil & Gas Mergers & Acquisitions Mega Season. Why Tanzania was so important in this deal and what could it mean for the massive Ruvuma onshore gas field & Solo Oil




“If you base the TCF valuation on the same benchmark as the Ophir-Pavilion deal where Pavilion paid $353 million per TCF for its 20% stake in Tanzania’s offshore blocks 1,3,4, then Ruvuma would be valued on an un-risked basis (1.17tcf) at $413 million minimum but on 2.3 tcf (AMINEX resource estimate for Ruvuma) of $811 million. Solo own 25% of the Ruvuma PSA. Accordingly the value attributable to Solo could be anywhere between $100 million to $200 million, and remember the Ntorya well in the Ruvuma PSA has pipeline infrastructure nearby and is an advanced project that can get into production very quickly.



When BG Group announced in August 2014 that it had produced higher than expected flows of gas from their Mzia-3 test well off the southern part of Tanzania's coast, it was news that must have caught the eye of Royal Dutch Shell.

Mzia-3 was not only producing better than expected results, but it was reaching a flow rate of 101 million cubic feet per day, nearly double the flow rate measured at their Mzia-2 well that had test flowed a year earlier.

The impressive flow rates served to boost the financial viability of BG Groups planned Tanzanian LNG terminal and associated upstream production facilities and infrastructure, a factor that must have also interested Shell.

Shell’s decision to buy BG Group was one that focused on long-term asset building. It has enabled the company to get access to BG Groups significant advanced exploration portfolio. BG Group had sunk huge capital into the ground. This is where Shell clearly saw the long-term value in this mega deal.

However, we feel it is access to Tanzania that featured as a major factor in the purchase of BG Group, given Shell ended a £1.12bn cash offer for Cove Energy back in 2012 which was designed to give the company a foothold in east Africa’s gas sector, that attempt sadly failed.

Shell’s major African continent gas projects are located primarily in west Africa, not ideal in terms of shipping logistics to the Asia market. Shell were fully aware of the gas potential in Tanzania. In 2002, the company won a Tanzania Petroleum Development Corporation tender for four offshore blocks around Zanzibar island, but the deal got blocked by the Tanzania government. Shell holds at least four exploration licenses off Zanzibar and is working with Petroleo Brasileiro SA on two off Tanzania. But it is the legal process of essentially two jurisdictions, Zanzibar and Tanzania that has served to hold up Shell’s progress offshore. The deal with BG Group, essentially fast tracks the company’s foothold into Tanzania, which is set to become a huge future supplier of gas to Asia.

BG Group entered Tanzania in 2010 and is the operator of offshore Blocks 1, 3 and 4 in which it has a 60% interest. Around 15 tcf of total gross resource has been discovered and work is progressing to develop a joint LNG plant in collaboration with the Block 2 partners. Mzia was confirmed as second giant gas discovery, after Jodari, other highlights include
·      Taachui gas discovery secured in Block 1
·      LNG site MoU signed with the government
·      HoA signed with Block 2 partners: BG Group is lead developer for pre-FEED
·      Contracts for upstream and LNG plant pre-FEED have already been awarded.


Putting this into context

Why Ruvuma must now be a major acquisition interest.

Back in November 2013, Ophir Energy (LSE:OPHR) announced the sale of 20% interest in Tanzania blocks 1, 3 and 4 to Pavilion Energy for a staggering $1,288 million. The transaction with Pavilion a wholly owned subsidiary of Temasek, the Singapore investment company, served as one of the most important pricing benchmarks for Tanzania’s hydrocarbon sector.

With the most recent gas discovery on the Kamba-1 well in Block 4, the total discovered gross 2C resource to date is estimated at 17.1TCF across the three blocks, which is enough to underpin a two train LNG development.

So essentially Pavilion paid $1.2 billion USD for 3.4 TCF or $353 million per TCF

It was also a deal that showed the strategic importance Asia investors are placing on Tanzania in respect of its huge gas export potential.  Given that the season for mega deals is now underway and why Tanzania is featuring at the centre stage of mega deal making once again, I think it is time to remind investors about Tanzania’s massive Ruvuma gas field.

The Ruvuma PSA originally covered 12,360 square kilometres in the extreme south-east of Tanzania of which roughly 80% is onshore and 20% offshore. This is a licence development area that was awarded back in 2005. Ten years of work has been undertaken on Ruvuma.

Within the PSA are two specific, adjoining licence areas, known as Lindi and Mtwara. Following the first exploration period and an extension about 75% of the area was relinquished and the remaining PSA covers 3,447 square kilometres. Prior to the award of the current PSA 1153 kilometres of 2D seismic had been acquired in the area of the PSC between 1981 and 2002. No wells had been drilling within the boundaries of the PSA, but a well at Lukeledi-1 to the north had been drilled by Texaco in 1992 and the Mnazi Bay-1 well to the southeast had been drilled by Agip in 1982. Following award of the PSA Ndovu Resources, a subsidiary of Aminex, acquired 370 kilometres of offshore seismic in the Lindi Block and a further 430 kilometres of 2D seismic onshore in the Lindi and Mtwara Blocks.

The first well under the Ruvuma PSA was drilled in 2010 on the Likonde prospect. Likonde-1 is located in the Lindi Block and encountered thick sands with hydrocarbon shows. The well was drilled to a total depth of 3,647 metres and results of drilling, wireline logs and side-wall coring showed that the well intersected two sandstone intervals of over 250 metres (820 feet) combined thickness with evidence of residual oil and gas. Drilling had to be terminated in the deepest objectives due to the high rate influx of gas.

Based on the encouraging results of the Likonde-1 well the available 2D seismic was reprocessed and reinterpreted to select the location for a second exploration well, within the Mtwara Block. The chosen location, Ntorya-1, was intended to target the updip extent of the sands encountered in the Likonde-1 well.

On the 6 October 2011, prior to the drilling of Ntoya-1, Solo announced that it has increased its stake in the Ruvuma Basin PSA from 12.5% to 18.75% by assuming the additional obligations associated with the additional interest relinquished by Tullow Oil who reduced their over holding from 50 to 25%.

Ntorya-1 was spudded on the 22 December 2011 and intersected a gross 25 metre section of Mid-Cretaceous sandstones with gas. The upper 3.5 metres of the gas bearing zone were tested at a maximum rate of 20.1 mmscfd with 139 barrels oil per day of 53 deg API condensate through a 1” choke. The flow rate was considered to be of potential commercial interest and well has been suspended.

After intersecting the primary target, but prior to deepening to the eventual discovery level in the Ntorya-1 well Tullow Oil elected to transfer their remaining 25% interest to the partners, Ndovu and Solo in proportion to their existing interests in return for the assignees accepting future obligations in the second exploration period. As a result Solo increased its interest in the Ntorya-1 discovery and the Ruvuma Basin PSA to 25%.

A resource report has been prepared by ISIS Petroleum Consultants that attributes 5.75 tcf of potential gas-in-place resources to the Ruvuma PSA. ISIS calculates that Ntorya holds mean 1.17 tcf of unrisked gas in place of which 178 bcf are considered discovered, but recently increased its internal resources estimate of Ruvuma to 2.3 tcf.

“If you base the TCF valuation on the same benchmark as the Ophir-Pavilion deal where Pavilion paid $353 million per TCF for its 20% stake in Tanzania’s offshore blocks 1,3,4, then Ruvuma would be valued on an un-risked basis (1.17tcf) at $413 million minimum but on 2.3 tcf (AMINEX resource estimate for Ruvuma) of $811 million. Solo own 25% of the Ruvuma PSA. Accordingly the value attributable to Solo could be anywhere between $100 million to $200 million, and remember the Ntorya well in the Ruvuma PSA has pipeline infrastructure nearby and is an advanced project that can get into production very quickly.



The Ntorya-1 discovery is now the subject to an application for an appraisal extension to the licence to carry out a two-year program of additional infill seismic and a further well. Elsewhere in the PSA an additional seismic program and two additional exploration wells are planned to follow-up the success of the first two wells. It is anticipated that a farm-in partner will be found to take up to a 50% interest in return for a substantial financial contribution to the remaining work program.

Essentially Ruvuma’s gas reserves equate to approximately 30% of BG Group’s stated Tanzania gas asset reserves. For Asia investors that want access to near term lower risk onshore gas production, then snapping up Ruvuma would be a very wise move.

Solo’s shares shot up last week on the back of the major oil reserve upgrade by the Horse Hill Development consortia, where they own 6.5% interest in the Horse Hill-1 well.

But we suspect the biggest value catalyst for Solo after their Kiliwani well enters production this year, will be Ruvuma. Watch this space.


Wednesday 8 April 2015

Royal Dutch Shell Deal with BG Group: Portfolio Re-Balancing Now Underway

Royal Dutch Shell announced today that an agreement had been reached with BG Group that will see the company purchase BG Group in a deal that values the business at £47bn.
The  cash and shares offer which gives investors a 50% premium on BG Group's share price on 7 April.


So here is the deal. You are an international oil and gas company, operating in a market that is seeing the prices for your hydrocarbon commodities becoming increasingly depressed and priced at levels seen back in 2004. Yet your cost base has risen steeply in the last ten years. Your reaction to these low oil and gas prices is to make redundancies and cut exploration costs. Ideally you want to re-balance your portfolio, get access to lower cost onshore oil and gas production and hopefully ride the storm until the price of oil and gas heads north. But you also want more access to gas, the commodity that is not so aligned to automotive sector demand, where a revolution is underway, vehicles are becoming much more fuel efficient, electric vehicles and hybrids are now becoming commonplace, Cars in general are lighter, more fuel efficient, and so are heavy goods vehicles.

Gas demand is related to power, domestic cooking, Asia needs lots more gas, coal fired power stations are bing replaced by cleaner gas fired power stations, the gas market is more interesting longer term. 

What Royal Dutch Shell and BG Group have collectively decided to do is to shape their future together, it is a reaction to the current market conditions that has prompted this deal.

For Royal Dutch Shell's shareholders, they get access BG's diverse global production portfolio which includes some fantastic world-class gas assets particularly in markets that are gearing up to supply Asia and in lower cost operating jurisdictions such as Africa's Qatar i.e. Tanzania
Shell get access to Tanzania's offshore Blocks 1, 3 and 4 and around 15 tcf of total gross gas resource, where BG have a 60% interest. It also gives Shell a massive foothold in Australia's gas market where BG Group is developing a two-train 8.5 mtpa LNG plant supplied by coal seam gas (CSG). The Queensland Curtis LNG (QCLNG) plant is being built on a 270 hectare site on Curtis Island, Gladstone, on the Queensland coast. 
BG Group’s business in Australia comprises: Licences in four onshore areas of producing and potential gas supply covering a total of around 33 000 square kilometres. 

The project’s total reserves and resources at the end of 2013 were 22 tcf (net BG Group): Surat Basin CSG play: producing gas for the domestic market and will provide production into the LNG plant; Bowen Basin CSG play: exploration and appraisal ongoing; Bowen Basin tight gas sand play: exploration and appraisal ongoing; Cooper Basin tight gas sand and shale gas plays: exploration and appraisal ongoing; A 540 kilometre pipeline network comprising a 200 kilometre gas collection header and a 340 kilometre export pipeline; Major shareholdings in the two-train liquefaction facility, including 100% equity in common facilities such as the LNG storage tanks and jetty; and The 140 megawatt Condamine power station.